1.
Gray, D.E.: Doing research in the real world. SAGE, London (2018).
2.
McLeod, S.: What’s the difference between qualitative and quantitative research? | Simply Psychology, https://www.simplypsychology.org/qualitative-quantitative.html.
3.
Rivas, C.: An Introduction to Reasoning in Qualitative & Quantitative Research | Sage Research Methods, https://methods.sagepub.com/video/srmpromo/pdui8u/an-introduction-to-reasoning-in-qualitative-and-quantitative-research.
4.
Gray, D.E.: Theoretical perspectives and research methodologies. In: Doing research in the real world. pp. 15–38. Sage, London (2018).
5.
Kankam, P.K.: The use of paradigms in information research. Library & Information Science Research. 41, 85–92 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.04.003.
6.
Gray, D.E.: Theoretical perspectives and research methodologies. In: Doing research in the real world. pp. 15–38. Sage, London (2018).
7.
Doyle, L., Brady, A.-M., Byrne, G.: An overview of mixed methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing. 14, 175–185 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987108093962.
8.
Creswell, J.: What is Mixed Methods Research? | YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OaNiTlpyX8, (2013).
9.
Andrew, S., Halcomb, E. eds: Mixed methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Wiley-Blackwell Pub, Chichester, U.K. (2009).
10.
Bryman, A., Bell, E.: Business research methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2015).
11.
Giddings, L.S.: Mixed-methods research. Journal of Research in Nursing. 11, 195–203 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987106064635.
12.
Auckland University of Technology: Auckland University of Technology code of conduct for research, https://www.aut.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/274371/AUT-CODE-OF-CONDUCT-FOR-RESEARCH-2019.pdf, (2019).
13.
Dr. John Perrott | Sci21, http://sci21.co.nz/speakers/john_perrott/.
14.
Code of Professional Standards and Ethics in Science, Technology and the Humanities, https://royalsociety.org.nz/assets/Uploads/Code-of-Prof-Stds-and-Ethics-Revision-2.pdf, (2018).
15.
Pringle, J.K., Wolfgramm, R., Henry, E.: Extending cross-ethnic research partnerships: Researching with respect. In: Katila, S., Merilainen, S., and Tienari, J. (eds.) Making inclusion work : Experiences from academia around the world. pp. 127–142. Edward Elgar Publishing, Incorporated, Cheltenham, UK (2010).
16.
Hudson, M., Milne, M., Reynolds, P., Russell, K., Smith, B.: Te Ara Tika - Guidelines for Māori research ethics: A framework for researchers and ethics committee members, https://www.hrc.govt.nz/sites/default/files/2019-06/Resource%20Library%20PDF%20-%20Te%20Ara%20Tika%20Guidelines%20for%20Maori%20Research%20Ethics_0.pdf, (2010).
17.
Barnes, H.M., Gunn, T.R., Barnes, A.M., Muriwai, E., Wetherell, M., McCreanor, T.: Feeling and spirit: Developing an indigenous wairua approach to research. Qualitative Research. 17, 313–325 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117696031.
18.
Pihama, L., Tiakiwai, S.-J., Kim, S. eds: Kaupapa Rangahau: A Reader, https://www.waikato.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/339885/Kaupapa-Rangahau-A-Reader_2nd-Edition.pdf, (2015).
19.
Henry, E., Pene, H.: Kaupapa Maori: Locating Indigenous Ontology, Epistemology and Methodology in the Academy. Organization. 8, 234–242 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508401082009.
20.
Smith, L.T.: Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples. Otago University Press, London (2012).
21.
Stewart-Withers, R., Sewabu, K., Richardson, S.: Talanoa: A contemporary qualitative methodology for sport management. Sport Management Review. 20, 55–68 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2016.11.001.
22.
Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review. 14, 532–550 (1989). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.
23.
Analysing qualitative data | Researching Academia, https://migrantacademics.wordpress.com/2016/02/03/analysing-qualitative-data/.
24.
Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N.: Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE, Los Angeles (2018).
25.
Smythe, L.: Discerning which qualitative approach fits best. New Zealand College of Midwives Journal. 5–12 (2012).
